Other than doing nothing to deserve a peace prize, noble, Nobel or otherwise (ditto Al Gore or Jimmy Carter, of course), Barack Obama is nonetheless now the poster child of the worldwide thought control movement, headquartered in Oslo, New York (U.N.) and Washington, D.C., with roots in every developed nation’s capital (oddly enough, Berlin may be the sole resistance).

Put simply, Obama is the poster child of how we all should think–as cogs in a totalitarian system that will manage us (sometimes perhaps even care for us) from cradle to grave, but at all times to rule us and tell us how to think and live.

The folks at Global Research had a great headline for denouncing the Nobel Peace Prize stunt–"When the Lie Becomes the Truth"–but their fret, though real, is not the real issue. They worry about an unchecked global military machine run by the U.S. and Israel and claim that the peace prize cements this war-mongering deal.

Though progressives have always heavily favored and practiced eugenics (abortion being another front in this war) and covert genocide through disease and starvation (Hitler let out the secret and forced others to go underground by openly conducting genocide), the awarding of the peace prize to Obama is much more a weapon in the war of thought control. (That’s why I half jokingly, half seriously predicted that Michael Moore would win next year’s Nobel Peace Prize).

Tom DeWeese captures it all brilliantly in his speech-turned-essay entitled "’Globally Acceptable Truth’ and the Crime of Thinking.’"

This is must reading, and here’s a snippet to get you going:

So, instead, we must set up a system of thought control. Certain ideas are the only ones safe to think. Globallyacceptable truth. And there must be a top-down control to assure bad thoughts are controlled or obliterated.

For it to work, the rest of us must be convinced or forced to stop thinking or using our own experiences, along with academic and scientific absolutes, to draw our own conclusion.

Once that is established, it is easy to reject morality, and then only a short step to accepting the idea that people of third world nations should live out their days in total poverty – just for the common good. And by way, eventually it would be good for all of us to live that way too.

It is then just as short journey to accepting euthanasia as a means to rid us of the elderly who are no longer useful for the village. And then, it’s an even shorter step to accepting the final solution of forced abortion for population control.